MEASURED 11 NOVEMBER 2026

Does e27.co block ChatGPT?

e27.co allows every crawler that can cite it in an AI answer, while declining 3 training crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Applebot-Extended). That is the "cite but do not train" position.

90%of 30 tracked AI crawlers can reach e27.co — 6 allowed, 3 blocked, 21 not listed

That is below the 100% median across the 1671 sites in this dataset. Resolved from https://e27.co/robots.txt on 11 November 2026.

Does e27.co block each AI product?

AI productPosition in robots.txtCrawlers checked
ChatGPTBlocks GPTBot; not OAI-SearchBot and ChatGPT-User3
ClaudeBlocks ClaudeBot; not Claude-SearchBot and Claude-User3
PerplexityAllows2
Gemini and Google AIAllows3
Microsoft CopilotAllows1
Apple IntelligenceBlocks all1
Meta AINo rule applies2

Has e27.co changed its AI crawler rules?

We read this file every week. Between 17 August 2026 and 11 November 2026 we recorded no lasting change in which AI crawlers it blocks. See which sites did change their rules.

What e27.co's robots.txt says about each AI crawler

A crawler named directly in its own group is governed by that group. One not named falls back to the wildcard group. Where neither exists the crawler is reported as not listed — no policy has been expressed, and in practice most crawlers will proceed.

User-agentOperatorPurposeAccessDecided by
OAI-SearchBotOpenAIsearch indexingAlloweddirect rule
GPTBotOpenAImodel trainingBlockeddirect rule
ChatGPT-UserOpenAIon-demand fetchNot listedno matching rule
Claude-SearchBotAnthropicsearch indexingAlloweddirect rule
ClaudeBotAnthropicmodel trainingBlockeddirect rule
Claude-UserAnthropicon-demand fetchAlloweddirect rule
PerplexityBotPerplexitysearch indexingAlloweddirect rule
Perplexity-UserPerplexityon-demand fetchNot listedno matching rule
Google-ExtendedGoogleGemini training controlAlloweddirect rule
BingbotMicrosoftCopilot search indexAlloweddirect rule
Applebot-ExtendedAppleApple Intelligence controlBlockeddirect rule
Meta-ExternalAgentMetamodel trainingNot listedno matching rule
AmazonbotAmazonmodel trainingNot listedno matching rule
BytespiderByteDancemodel trainingNot listedno matching rule
CCBotCommon Crawltraining datasetNot listedno matching rule
GoogleOtherGoogleresearch and development fetchNot listedno matching rule
Google-CloudVertexBotGoogleVertex AI on-demand fetchNot listedno matching rule
Meta-ExternalFetcherMetaon-demand fetchNot listedno matching rule
MistralAI-UserMistral AIon-demand fetchNot listedno matching rule
cohere-aiCoheremodel trainingNot listedno matching rule
DuckAssistBotDuckDuckGoon-demand fetchNot listedno matching rule
YouBotYou.comsearch indexingNot listedno matching rule
TimpibotTimpitraining datasetNot listedno matching rule
AI2BotAllen Institute for AImodel trainingNot listedno matching rule
DiffbotDiffbotstructured-data extractionNot listedno matching rule
ImagesiftBotImageSifttraining datasetNot listedno matching rule
PetalBotHuaweisearch indexingNot listedno matching rule
OmgilibotWebz.iotraining datasetNot listedno matching rule
ElevenlabsCrawlerElevenLabsmodel trainingNot listedno matching rule
ElevenlabsBotElevenLabson-demand fetchNot listedno matching rule

Does e27.co allow AI training?

For each AI company with both kinds of crawler: whether this robots.txt lets its training crawlers in, and whether it lets in the crawlers behind its answers.

AI companyTrainingAnswers
OpenAIRefused GPTBotAllowed OAI-SearchBot, ChatGPT-User
AnthropicRefused ClaudeBotAllowed Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User
MetaAllowed Meta-ExternalAgentAllowed Meta-ExternalFetcher
ElevenLabsAllowed ElevenlabsCrawlerAllowed ElevenlabsBot

Google is not in this table: its AI answers read what Googlebot may read, and its training control is Google-Extended, in the full list.

The shared AI-training signal

On 11 November 2026 this file had no group for __usage_ai-training, so it expresses no preference with the shared signal. A rule under User-agent: * is not read as one, and each company's own crawler rules above keep their meaning.

Google announced this signal on 30 October 2026 and plans to support it with other AI companies in 2027. It is a draft standard and no company has confirmed it reads it yet, so this is what the file says, not what happens to the content.

What this does and does not tell you

It tells you what e27.co states in its robots.txt, which is the file every well-behaved AI crawler consults before fetching. It is a stated preference and a voluntary protocol — not an access control, and not evidence about what any crawler actually did.

It also says nothing about whether the content is useful to an answer engine once fetched. Access is the precondition; extractable passages, visible dates, named authorship and sourced claims decide whether a reachable page is actually cited. Sign up for a free AI visibility report to see the original answers and which pages they cite.

Finally, robots.txt changes. This page reflects e27.co as it was on 11 November 2026. To see the current position, inspect the domain’s live robots.txt file and its matching rules.

Check your own site

Run the free AI crawler checker on your own site for the same verdict on every crawler, and the robots.txt lines to change if one is blocked by mistake. The ChatGPT citation guide explains the distinction between training and search access.

Browse the full study of 1671 measured domains, or the technology media category, to see how this compares.

Embed this result

A live badge for e27.co, updated whenever this report refreshes. Paste it into a README or site footer:

EMBED HTML
<a href="https://www.indexhalo.com/ai-crawler-report/e27.co/">
  <img src="https://www.indexhalo.com/badge/ai-crawler-access/e27.co.svg"
       alt="AI crawler access for e27.co: 90%" height="20">
</a>
Who started blocking which crawler this week, measured from live robots.txt. Unsubscribe in one click.