REAL INDEXHALO DEMO · MAILCHIMP
A mention is the beginning of the investigation
Answers naming the brand4 / 5
Answers citing its website1 / 5
Mailchimp appears in four of five usable answers in its saved sample; its own website is cited in one. The next useful question is which pages supported the answers.
Your next move. Follow the original answers into Domains and URLs, then prepare an evidence-backed review. This example demonstrates the IndexHalo workflow.
One saved question · collected 17 October 2026 · 5 usable answers. Failed and pending attempts are excluded. Public brand example, not a customer endorsement or a claim of market-wide performance.
See the real dashboard guide (PDF) →See what a month looks like. A month of checks for the HubSpot example: 63 AI answers to 8 questions in 2 markets, 13 Oct 2026 – 25 Oct 2026, with what each AI answered, what changed between checks and what to do next. Independent example; HubSpot is not an IndexHalo customer. Read the month's report (PDF)
Why choose IndexHalo?
Go beyond a mention count with IndexHalo: inspect original answers and cited sources, diagnose pages, prepare actions and deliver stakeholder reports. Every tier includes the full IndexHalo feature set.
- Every IndexHalo feature on every tier. Choose the search allowance that fits your work.
- Weekly re-checks included. Professional includes 10 questions re-checked weekly; Business 30; Agency 150. No credits are used. Daily checks use credits.
- A flexible monthly search budget. Allocate complete searches to recurring questions, new clients or focused investigations.
- Evidence you can act on. Inspect original answers and source relationships, prepare a practical action brief and export a stakeholder report.
- Reuse your saved work. Reading and exporting saved reports costs no additional search credit.
Get my free AI report → · Choose your subscription →
How this comparison was checked · 22 October 2026. Published by IndexHalo. IndexHalo is one of the products being compared. This is a source-based buying guide, not an independent review or a hands-on test of the competitor’s paid product. Product names identify their owners and do not imply endorsement.
Compare the entry price, source coverage and repeat workload.
Evaluate OtterlyAI when its included source set and daily tracking support the job at the required budget. Evaluate IndexHalo when you want a fixed pool of complete searches with the same reporting and analysis feature set on every plan. IndexHalo does not claim to be universally cheaper. Add-ons and source differences should be explicit in any matched quote.
What the current vendor page says
OtterlyAI has a lower advertised starting price than IndexHalo. It lists monthly Lite at $29 for 15 prompts, Standard at $189 for 100 and Premium at $489 for 400. The plans advertise daily tracking across four included engines. Claude, Google AI Mode and Gemini are listed as add-ons; annual billing has different prices.
The listed included engines are ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Microsoft Copilot. The page describes brand, sentiment and citation tracking; some access and analytics capabilities vary by tier. Its help centre lists 74 countries, an English-only dashboard, PDF brand reports with an optional custom logo and a Looker Studio connector on Standard plans and above. Check the current add-on price for your selected package.
Read the current official OtterlyAI page → · Check the documented billing units. Treat this as a dated snapshot; checkout or a written quote determines the current terms.
What IndexHalo includes
Professional: $49 USD/month for 100 credits; Business: $129 USD/month for 300 credits; Agency: $299 USD/month for 750 credits, plus applicable tax. Every tier has the same IndexHalo feature set; the monthly search allowance changes. One credit covers one complete question, market/language and run across selected available sources. Plan and top-up credits expire at the end of the billing month and do not roll over. Credits bought as one-time packs before monthly plans launched keep their balance and are shown separately. Reading and exporting saved reports does not use another search credit.
Multiple included sources do not multiply the credits. A repeat run is another search; two market/language combinations require two searches.
The workflow takes you from a buyer question to original answers, brand mentions, source relationships, practical actions and a stakeholder report. Consumer experiences and API-labelled evidence retain their collection labels. Referrals and crawler-activity views need their stated inputs. A full feature set within IndexHalo does not imply feature parity with another vendor.
Every plan also includes the REST API, an MCP endpoint for your own assistant, BI feeds for Google Sheets, Looker Studio, Excel and Power BI, signed webhooks with Slack and Microsoft Teams messages, white-label report exports, read-only client portal links and scheduled searches within the credit limits you approve. See every capability and every integration.
A workload worth pricing
Fifteen questions checked daily over 30 days represent 450 complete IndexHalo searches, not 15. That exceeds Professional’s 100 and Business’s 300 allowances. Fifteen questions checked four times require 60 searches. Both patterns can be valid; they answer different operational needs.
These are planning examples, not customer outcomes. Confirm actual calendar dates, markets, languages, collection methods and source availability. An included prompt, a model response, a corpus lookup and an agent action are different quantities. Calculate both the invoice and the work required to produce a useful result.
How to evaluate both products
Write down the required sources before running a trial. Use the same question and market where supported, inspect a citation in its original context, and prepare a real client report. Compare both the subscription invoice and the time needed to complete that deliverable.
- Freeze the questions, market and purpose before testing.
- Inspect an original answer and its timestamp rather than comparing headline scores alone.
- Check whether a source is retrieved, cited at response level or attached to a specific passage.
- Preserve failures and unknown values; do not convert them into observed negatives.
- Export a report for a real stakeholder and check its readability and evidence.
- Record current commercial terms, required add-ons and any unresolved requirements.
Put IndexHalo to work for your business
Start with your own buyer question and see the evidence for yourself. Then choose Professional, Business or Agency for 100, 300 or 750 monthly searches, with the full IndexHalo feature set on every tier.
Get my free AI report → · View subscriptions →
Choose the workflow that supports the decisions you will make repeatedly. A higher collection frequency is useful when it changes those decisions; a richer report is useful when a team can act on it. Neither an advertised feature list nor a small sample establishes superior accuracy, guaranteed citations or future revenue.
Start with a real IndexHalo example report, follow the Academy workflow, or run your first report. For the wider shortlist, use the eight-product comparison hub.
What this comparison does not establish
We have not independently tested OtterlyAI’s paid collection, sampling, citation extraction, report accuracy or support response. A public feature listing cannot resolve those questions. Ask the vendor to demonstrate the exact workflow and explain its measurement rules using a real retained answer. The source-based descriptions above should guide an evaluation, not substitute for one.
Who wrote this: IndexHalo published this guide and is one of the products being compared. The planning examples are arithmetic, not measured customer results. No claim here establishes superior accuracy or guaranteed business outcomes. Send factual corrections to support@indexhalo.com.
